DIBELS Data System Sample Reports

Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills, University of Oregon
Class Progress Summary

District:	Test District		Adams	Grade:	Kindergarten
Class:	Adams K #2	Assessment:		Academic Year:	2001-2002

If students have been tested for the final assessment period of the year, instructional recommendations will be included and the list will be sorted by primary indicator.

Name	September		January				May			Instructional Recommendations
Name	ISF	LNF	ISF	LNF	PSF	NWF	LNF	PSF	NWF	Instructional Recommendations
D, FAYTH	0	6	26	22	50	26
D, BRITTANY	0	0	12	0	3	4	4	4	1	Intensive - Needs Substantial Intervention
B, SARAH	0	8	19	16	7	10	22	11	22	Intensive - Needs Substantial Intervention
B, MATHEW	3	10	14	18	16	12	33	37	26	Benchmark - At Grade Level
V, JOHNATHON	5	2	13	18	27	16	46	37	33	Benchmark - At Grade Level
E, SERENA	0	17	21	7	32	0	28	45	39	Strategic - Additional Intervention
M, RACHEL	0	0	19	12	36	8	16	47	26	Strategic - Additional Intervention
S, KYLER	22	6	30	25	48	7	38	47	34	Benchmark - At Grade Level
H, KENDRA	19	62	30	80	52	59	67	50	72	Benchmark - At Grade Level
C, ZACHARY	38	44	34	68	50	53	47	51	77	Benchmark - At Grade Level
J, MADISON	18	28	24	59	50	43	52	52	60	Benchmark - At Grade Level
H, OLIVIA	17	32	29	36	14	30	53	56	37	Benchmark - At Grade Level
P, CHRYSALICE	25	27	24	39	40	33	52	57	40	Benchmark - At Grade Level
V, SHANIA	9	28	14	37	42	22	46	58	50	Benchmark - At Grade Level
S, BRIANA	4	18	34	28	50	27	50	59	37	Benchmark - At Grade Level
G, BENJAMIN	19	29	23	40	42	29	42	60	36	Benchmark - At Grade Level
E, MELISSA	0	2	41	44	33	20	71	60	60	Benchmark - At Grade Level
F, KARLEE	14	3	30	32	30	25	59	61	48	Benchmark - At Grade Level
G, TEVIN	25	30	32	69	59	27	63	66	39	Benchmark - At Grade Level
W, LAURA	42	25	60	55	55	40	69	66	53	Benchmark - At Grade Level
S, KYLE	7	0	24	9	34	10	59	68	35	Benchmark - At Grade Level
J, SARAH	28	10	38	51	55	26	72	81	38	Benchmark - At Grade Level